IRREVERENT Newzwire
NEW YORK - Celebrity Pamela Anderson was arrested at JFK today when TSA officials extended their ban on gels, pastes and liquids to include "silicone and saline-based breast implants."
Read more...
Lucas The Liberal? Print E-mail
Written by Scott Meadow   
Wednesday, 04 May 2005 (read 1581 times)
Apparently even mentioning Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 without condemnation is too liberal for some conservatives.  In a recent Wired piece, George Lucas mentioned the controversial film:

Fahrenheit 9/11. People went nuts. The folk aspects of that film were George Bush or Iraq or 9/11 or -- intense emotional issues that made people put up their blinders and say, "I have an opinion about this, and I'm not going to accept anything else." If you could look at these issues more open-mindedly -- at what's going on with the human mind behind all this, on all sides -- you could have a more interesting conversation, without people screaming, plugging their ears, and walking out of the room like kids do. (click here for the whole article)

"So what?" you may say.  Well apparently this just way pissed off  conservatives like Libertas who saw this as promoting "subversive" filmmaking, in which "film is there to be used to shape people’s values," seemingly ignoring the obvious fact that, by this argument all filmmakers are "subversive" because there's always a message.  Apparently in Conservativille you can make art without having any message whatsoever.  All Lucas did was state the obvious, and then slap Moore for not making his point more effectively.  Perhaps it's that Lucas isn't judging and condemning Moore outright that so irritates the conservative mind.  Perhaps it's just that nobody took art appreciation at the Heritage Foundation and whipped out some talking points so it's all very confusing to them, I dunno.  Maybe they're just not paying attention to what they watch or thinking critically about the movies they do like.

Okay, well, here ya go fellas:

  • All films have a statement.  People who have nothing to say don't make movies.

  • A film's message can move you; that's generally called a 'good film.'  If it was a bad film, you'll learn more about the human condition from reading your breakfast cereal.  For reference, check out The Flintstones (1994).  Okay some movies don't have a message.  Well this movie anyway.

  • If a film's message causes you to rethink something you believe, maybe it's because you're understanding another perspective and learning something new and NOT because of some massive conspiracy against your value system.  Maybe.. *gasp* ..  when looked at from a certain perspective, one you hadn't thought about before... you're wrong.  Insight isn't always bad, is it?

  • Not everything is propaganda.  Knock it off with the Nazi Germany allusions already.  It's old.

Granted, some movies have more to say than others, and more interesting things to say, and yeah Star Wars can be viewed as analagous to America's engagement in ..*yawn*.. Vietnam, blah blah.  There's a warning about technological dependence in The Terminator series, a message about fate and chance, along with lots of special effects.  Yeah, we liberals sure do like to explore the human condition, all righty, and if that pisses you off, maybe just stick with the Ozzy and Harriet fiction collection you got for X-mas.

Hmmm.  Art without a statement.  I'm no art professor, but I'd guess that even that is making a statement.


< Previous   Next >
©1993-2008 IRREVERENT Publishing, LLC unless otherwise noted. ISSN 1932-4952. Use of other parties' copyrighted works is included either with permission or under the terms of Fair Use. Works owned by other parties will be removed at the request of the copyright holder. Opinions expressed by writers are entirely their own, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of IRREVERENT Publishing, LLC.

IRREVERENT Magazine (irrmag.com)