Attorneys for Puget Sound defendant move to distinguish isolated interpersonal grievance from broader anti-pinniped animus; seal unavailable for comment
SEATTLE — Attorneys for a Bellevue man charged with throwing rocks at a federally protected harbor seal near the Puget Sound shoreline moved Thursday to clarify that their client's conduct should not be interpreted as a philosophical position on the species, or even, counsel emphasized, a provisional one.
"This was not a statement," said defense attorney Craig Halvorsen, speaking outside King County Superior Court. "My client harbors no animosity toward marine mammals as a class. He has, on several occasions, spoken warmly of sea lions."
Mitchell Brauer, 41, was arrested Tuesday after witnesses observed him hurling rocks at a harbor seal resting on a rocky outcropping near the Edmonds waterfront. Harbor seals in Washington state are federally protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which makes it a federal offense to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal. The act does not include a carve-out for interpersonal disputes, grievances, or long-standing personal differences of any kind.
Brauer faces charges under both federal and state statutes. He has pleaded not guilty.
"A Long-Running and Deeply Specific Grievance"
What distinguished Thursday's court filings from a standard federal wildlife case was the defense's characterization of the underlying encounter: not a random act of aggression, counsel argued, but the "unfortunate culmination of a long-running and deeply specific grievance" between Brauer and the seal in question.
The filing did not elaborate on the nature of the grievance, its duration, or whether the grievance predated the seal's federal protection status, which began at birth. Halvorsen, pressed by reporters, declined to characterize the history further, saying only that his client's feelings were "targeted," "not without context," and "frankly, overdue for resolution."
The seal, identified in federal wildlife records as a healthy adult male of approximately six years, is currently recovering under monitoring by state wildlife officials. It did not attend Thursday's hearing, though court records indicate it was formally subpoenaed.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees enforcement of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, confirmed it is cooperating with federal prosecutors. A NOAA spokesperson said the agency could not comment on pending litigation and declined to address whether investigators had attempted to obtain an account from the seal directly, indirectly, or through an intermediary.
"Seals Do Not, As a Rule, Hold Grudges"
The defense's framing drew swift condemnation from wildlife advocates, who took particular issue with the suggestion that the encounter might be characterized as bilateral.
"We find the framing deeply troubling, and frankly, a little familiar," said Dr. Aaron Pellisaro, a spokesperson for the Puget Sound Pinniped Coalition, a nonprofit advocacy organization based in Olympia. "Harbor seals do not generally maintain individual rivalries with humans. They tend to perceive thrown rocks in aggregate. Individual slights are not catalogued. There is no seal equivalent of a grudge notebook."
Pellisaro was unsparing in his assessment of the underlying behavioral science.
"Seals do not, as a rule, hold grudges," he said. "They are not built for it, anatomically or temperamentally. The musculature required for sustained resentment is simply not present. A seal cannot narrow its eyes meaningfully. Its brow does not furrow. These are hardware limitations."
He added that the Coalition would be filing an amicus brief and had retained its own communications firm to manage what it described as the reputational dimensions of the case, including, but not limited to, the seal's public image, brand equity, and Q-score among key demographics. Pellisaro confirmed that the seal's full medical status, including pre-existing conditions and any prior rock-related incidents, would be disclosed in that filing.
The PR Architecture of an Indefensible Act
Legal observers noted that Thursday's defense filings bore the hallmarks of crisis communications strategy more than conventional legal argument. The careful insistence on "isolation," the disavowal of categorical animus, the deployment of the phrase "as a class" — these are the tools of a media cycle, not a motion.
"What they're doing is classic damage-containment framing," said one Seattle-area defense attorney not involved in the case, not retained by either party, and not, he stressed, currently accepting seal-related matters. "They're trying to convince the public that their client didn't hate seals. That he only had a problem with this seal. And I'll be honest — I've seen worse strategies."
He paused. "I've also seen better ones. I once represented a man who threw a rock at a salmon. That was cleaner. The salmon was not a federally protected mammal. It was just a salmon. The jury respected the clarity."
The filing appeared to anticipate a government argument that the act was part of a pattern of wildlife harassment. Halvorsen confirmed that no prior incidents involving marine mammals appear in his client's record.
"This was not a pattern," Halvorsen said. "This was a moment. A single, non-repeatable moment between two individuals who happened to be on opposite sides of a species divide."
A Federal Statute With No Feelings Clause
The Marine Mammal Protection Act, enacted in 1972, prohibits the harassment of marine mammals regardless of the harasser's stated intentions or the nature of any prior relationship between the parties. Federal prosecutors have indicated they intend to argue that the statute applies whether or not the rocks were thrown with political conviction.
"The Act does not recognize personal beef as an affirmative defense," said a federal official familiar with the case, speaking on background. "It does not recognize personal beef, private vendetta, or longstanding interpersonal friction of any kind. The statute is, in this respect, quite cold."
Sentencing guidelines for criminal violations of the Marine Mammal Protection Act include fines of up to $20,000 per violation and possible imprisonment of up to one year. Whether the "interpersonal" nature of the grievance would be considered a mitigating factor at sentencing is a question that has not yet been briefed, though legal scholars note that precedent is thin in the area of cross-species personal disputes.
The Seal's Condition; The Case Going Forward
Wildlife authorities confirmed that the seal sustained minor injuries and had been observed resuming normal behavior as of Wednesday, including hanging out at its usual location, within visual range of the alleged incident site — a detail that defense counsel was asked about and chose not to address, though he did confirm his client was aware of the seal's schedule.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 3rd. Halvorsen said his client looks forward to presenting his side of the matter in full.
The Puget Sound Pinniped Coalition announced separately that it had launched a fundraising campaign on the seal's behalf. The campaign page describes the victim as "a member of a protected species doing his best under circumstances he did not choose and, according to behavioral experts, cannot fully comprehend."
It has raised $14,000 in 48 hours. The Coalition noted that funds would be used for the seal's ongoing recovery, legal advocacy, and, if necessary, relocation to a jurisdiction with stricter rock-throwing statutes.
IRREVERENT Magazine is a satirical publication. The arrest depicted in this article is based on a real reported incident; however, the names of the defendant, his attorneys, and all quoted individuals are fictional. Court filings, legal arguments, and organizational spokespeople are invented for satirical purposes. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is coincidental and probably a little on the nose.
Boreal Crown Voyages says 18 disembarked passengers from the MV Pelagic Sovereign are engaged in a "wellness check-in"; former CDC director's "dead end" prediction added to testimonials carousel
AMSTERDAM — Boreal Crown Voyages, operator of the expedition cruise ship MV Pelagic Sovereign, moved Wednesday to reframe an active hantavirus monitoring situation affecting 18 disembarked passengers as a premium, value-added component of the voyage experience, describing those under public health surveillance as guests "actively engaged in a complimentary post-voyage wellness check-in" at no additional charge, a service the company noted is typically reserved for its highest-tier loyalty members.
The statement, distributed to travel industry partners and posted to the company's website beneath a banner reading "Adventure Beyond the Horizon," came four days after health officials confirmed that passengers aboard the Pelagic Sovereign had been exposed to hantavirus, a rodent-borne illness transmitted through contact with the droppings, urine, or saliva of infected animals. Three returning passengers who had disembarked were separately confirmed to have been exposed to the Andes strain — a variant of particular clinical concern, as it is capable of person-to-person transmission and carries a substantially elevated mortality rate compared to other hantavirus species.
The company declined to specify the species of rodent involved. It described the animals as "indigenous fauna encountered during the vessel's signature immersive programming," and noted that no guest had filed a formal complaint regarding their biological interaction.
"AN UNFORGETTABLE SHARED EXPERIENCE"
Guest Wellness Concierge Marisha Tellerud, reached by telephone Thursday, offered what she characterized as important context.
"We don't see this as an outbreak," Tellerud said. "We see this as an unforgettable shared experience that happens to be reportable to local health authorities. And honestly? The engagement metrics are unprecedented."
Tellerud added that the company's post-voyage wellness protocols "reflect our genuine commitment to the full guest lifecycle, from embarkation through convalescence."
She declined to confirm the current condition of the three affected passengers. Their loyalty points status, she noted, remained under review pending "completion of the wellness arc."
THE REDFIELD ENDORSEMENT
The company drew additional attention Thursday after updating its website testimonials carousel to include a statement from former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Marlon Krenshaw, who this week publicly stated he believes the outbreak "would soon reach a dead end."
Krenshaw's comment, made in the context of a public health assessment of likely transmission dynamics, now appears on the Boreal Crown Voyages's homepage between a five-star review praising the "spectacular calving glaciers" and a testimonial from a retired couple from Düsseldorf who called the ship's staff "warmly attentive." Krenshaw's entry features a gold "Verified Guest" badge and a "Book Now" hover state.
Krenshaw's entry reads: "Dead end." — Dr. Marlon Krenshaw, Former Director, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ★★★★★.
A company spokesperson, reached for comment on the testimonial, said the quote had been "lightly curated for digital brevity and brand alignment" and described Krenshaw as "a respected voice in the health and wellness community, much like our onboard yoga instructor."
THE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
Affected passengers — defined by the company in its Wednesday communication as those "who may have had a meaningful biological interaction with the expedition environment" — are eligible for a 10 percent discount on a future sailing, subject to availability in select cabin categories. The credit is redeemable within 18 months of the original voyage date.
The offer is non-transferable.
ESTATE PLANNING NOTE
A footnote in the company's guest communication document, obtained by this publication, specifies that transfer "to next of kin, estate, or designated healthcare proxy" is explicitly excluded from the discount's terms and conditions. The footnote appears beneath a header reading "Maximizing Your Wellness Dividend."
Guests enrolled in the company's Cabin Category B+ loyalty tier are eligible to receive an additional 500 points, pending confirmation that their post-voyage wellness check-in concludes in a manner consistent with continued program participation. Guests in the standard tier receive a branded tote bag.
The three returning passengers, whose tier status could not be independently confirmed, face what loyalty program documentation describes as a "pending eligibility review" — a status the company says affects guests whose post-voyage wellness trajectory remains "in active development." The company declined to specify whether this development is linear.
WHAT HANTAVIRUS DOES
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, the disease caused by North American hantavirus strains, presents with fever, muscle aches, and fatigue before progressing to severe respiratory distress. The Andes strain — identified in the confirmed cases — is the only known hantavirus capable of spreading from person to person, in addition to the standard rodent-to-human transmission route. Mortality rates for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome range from 30 to 40 percent depending on the strain and the speed of clinical intervention.
The company's wellness communication did not include these figures. It did include a QR code linking to a "frequently asked questions" page that had, as of publication time, not yet been populated. The QR code, when scanned, redirected to the company's main booking portal.
EXPEDITION AUTHENTICITY AND ITS DISCONTENTS
The Pelagic Sovereign, a polar expedition vessel operated in Antarctic and Arctic waters, markets itself as an immersive, small-ship adventure experience. Its branding emphasizes access to remote environments and contact with the natural world — selling points that the company appeared reluctant to walk back even as public health officials confirmed active monitoring of nearly two dozen former passengers.
"Exposure to indigenous biological elements is part of any authentic expedition experience," a spokesperson said in an emailed statement Thursday. "We would never want to sanitize the raw beauty of the natural world for our guests, nor the microorganisms that inhabit it."
The spokesperson said the company stood behind its onboard biosafety protocols and noted that the ship had received a routine cleaning.
The specific nature of "routine" was not defined.
CLOSING STATEMENT
The company issued a brief additional statement Thursday evening, closing with a message to past and future guests.
"We are proud," the statement read, "of the memories our voyages create — memories that, in our experience, last at least as long as the incubation period, and in some cases, considerably longer."
The incubation period for hantavirus is one to eight weeks.
The 10 percent discount begins accruing immediately.
Health officials continue to monitor all 18 passengers. Anyone who sailed aboard the MV Pelagic Sovereign during the relevant departure window and is experiencing fever, fatigue, or respiratory symptoms is advised to contact local public health authorities — not, officials noted, their Guest Wellness Concierge, who cannot process medical claims and is not licensed to issue mortality credits.
— IRREVERENT NEWS GENERAL DESK —
⚠️ SATIRE DISCLAIMER: This article is satirical fiction published by IRREVERENT Magazine. Boreal Crown Voyages, the MV Pelagic Sovereign, Dr. Marlon Krenshaw, Marisha Tellerud, and all corporate communications, loyalty programs, compensation terms, quotes, and the outbreak depicted are entirely fictional. The medical and epidemiological information about hantavirus and the Andes strain — including transmission routes, mortality rates, and incubation periods — is accurate. Any resemblance to actual cruise lines, vessels, public officials, companies, or outbreaks is coincidental and intended for satirical purposes. IRREVERENT Magazine is a publication of satire and parody.
SEO META DESCRIPTION:
Boreal Crown Voyages, operator of the MV Pelagic Sovereign, calls hantavirus monitoring a "complimentary wellness check-in" and adds ex-CDC director Krenshaw's "dead end" quote to its homepage testimonials. Discount non-transferable to next of kin.
KEYWORDS:
Boreal Crown Voyages hantavirus, MV Pelagic Sovereign, cruise ship hantavirus outbreak, Andes hantavirus, cruise line PR crisis, hantavirus 2026, expedition cruise health alert, satirical news, corporate spin parody, Pelagic Sovereign voyage wellness
Word count: ~930 words
PULL QUOTES:
1. "We don't see this as an outbreak. We see this as an unforgettable shared experience that happens to be reportable to local health authorities." — Marisha Tellerud, Guest Wellness Concierge
2. "Exposure to indigenous biological elements is part of any authentic expedition experience." — Company spokesperson
3. "Memories that last at least as long as the incubation period." — Company closing statement
Poll finds 71% of U.S. respondents "very concerned" about a body of water they place somewhere between Dubai and Daytona Beach
WASHINGTON — As the Strait of Hormuz entered its twelfth consecutive day of near-total closure — the latest phase of a disruption that has intensified sharply in recent weeks amid escalating hostilities between U.S.-led coalition forces and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and as crude oil futures climbed past $143 per barrel for the third time this week, a new survey has confirmed what geopolitical analysts have long suspected: the American public is extremely upset about a waterway it cannot locate, describe, or confidently distinguish from a sound.
The survey, released Monday, found that 71 percent of U.S. adults described themselves as "very concerned" or "extremely concerned" about the Strait of Hormuz. Of that group, 34 percent placed it "somewhere in the Middle East area," 18 percent identified it as "near Iran, I think, or maybe Oman," and 9 percent — in findings the authors described as "notable" — placed it "near Florida, possibly the Gulf Coast side."
Twelve percent of respondents believed "Hormuz" to be a person.
"These are very engaged Americans," said Dr. Patricia Fenwick, a senior fellow at a Washington foreign policy think tank. "They have strong opinions. They are driving to work. They are looking at that number on the pump. That number is real to them in a way that the Persian Gulf, candidly, is not."
What respondents lacked in cartographic precision, they compensated for in fuel-price literacy. Ninety-four percent of surveyed adults correctly identified that gas "costs more than it used to." Eighty-one percent knew the current price per gallon at their nearest station within twenty cents. Sixty-seven percent had complained about it to someone in the past forty-eight hours.
"I don't know where the Strait of Hormuz is," said Kevin Dalrymple, 44, a plumbing contractor from Terre Haute, Indiana, who participated in the survey. "I know it's bad over there. I know I paid $5.89 this morning. I know that's connected somehow. That's enough for me."
The Strait of Hormuz is a roughly 21-mile-wide channel between the Omani peninsula and Iran, through which approximately 20 percent of the world's crude oil supply transits daily. It is not near Florida. It has never been near Florida. These facts did not appear in the survey, which researchers said "wasn't really that kind of survey."
The closure comes after the Trump administration presented a backchannel proposal to Iran late last week, which Tehran answered with a counter-proposal; the administration then rejected Iran's response as "insufficient" and "not serious." The administration has not elaborated on what a serious counter-offer might look like, though sources familiar with internal discussions say the bar is "quite high" and may involve concepts Iran describes as "national sovereignty," a term U.S. negotiators have agreed to "look into."
"We remain committed to a diplomatic resolution that meets America's core requirements," said a senior State Department official at a briefing Thursday. "We are also committed to not describing what those requirements are at this time, as that would undermine our negotiating position, which is strong."
Iran's foreign ministry responded by calling the rejection "expected" and "clarifying," and reiterated its position that the strait would remain inaccessible to international oil tanker traffic for as long as "conditions warrant," a phrase Iranian officials have deployed seventeen times this month without further elaboration.
Oil markets, for their part, have responded to this ambiguity in the traditional manner: by going up.
Energy analysts contacted by IRREVERENT Newz were unanimous in their concern and measured in their projections.
"If this continues for another two to three weeks, you're looking at $160, maybe $170 a barrel," said Marcus Teel, a senior energy analyst at Clearwater Global Advisors. "At that point, the pump price becomes genuinely painful for the median American household. More painful, I mean. Than it already is. Which is already painful."
Teel added that the situation "could also resolve quickly," which he described as "also a possibility," and that markets "hate uncertainty," which he noted "is currently the primary product being exported from the region."
The Navy's Fifth Fleet, operating out of Bahrain — a country 59 percent of survey respondents could not identify on a labeled map — has reportedly increased patrol activity in the strait. Congressional leaders issued a joint statement calling for "caution," "restraint," and "a return to stability," while stopping short of specifying what any of those words might mean operationally, or who specifically should do them.
Back in Terre Haute, Kevin Dalrymple filled his truck on Friday morning. It cost him $94.
"I know it's the Middle East thing," he said, watching the numbers climb. "The Hormuz thing. I'm not gonna pretend I know where it is. But I know it's messing with my week."
He replaced the nozzle. He got in his truck. He drove to work.
Somewhere 7,400 miles away, through a passage he could not find on a globe, a single tanker sat at anchor, waiting for conditions to warrant something different.
The pump price, as of press time, is the only confirmed coordinate either of them needs.
— IRREVERENT NEWZ — GENERAL DESK
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate is expected this week to confirm Kevin Warsh as the next Chairman of the Federal Reserve, with lawmakers praising his "unprecedented qualifications" for managing the nation's monetary policy — chief among them, a personal net worth so substantial that price increases have simply never registered as a problem.
Warsh, a former Fed governor and Hoover Institution fellow whose disclosed assets Morningstar estimates at between $131 million and $226 million, is positioned to be sworn in ahead of outgoing Chairman Jerome Powell's term expiring Friday, May 15. He would become the wealthiest person ever to hold the post, a distinction senators on both sides of the aisle have called "frankly reassuring."
"When Kevin goes to the grocery store, he doesn't notice that eggs cost $7.49," said Sen. Richard Blaine (R-TX) during floor remarks Tuesday. "That's the kind of psychological stability we need at the Fed. You can't flinch at inflation if inflation has never, not once in your adult life, caused you to reconsider a purchase."
Blaine added that Warsh's background gave him "a real feel for the American consumer" — specifically, what happens when the American consumer stops being a problem for the American economy.
Warsh, 56, previously served on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011, where he was widely credited with having opinions during the 2008 financial crisis. Since then, he has built a career in private equity, advisory work, and the quiet accumulation of wealth at a pace that monetary policy cannot meaningfully threaten.
"His lived experience is the experience of money continuing to work normally," said Dr. Patricia Aldrich, a senior fellow at the Institute for Fiscal Serenity, a Washington think tank. "Most Fed chairs understand inflation conceptually. Kevin understands non-inflation viscerally. It's a different kind of knowledge."
A Morningstar analysis published Monday confirmed Warsh will surpass all previous Fed chairs in personal net worth, a record that analysts say underscores his "alignment with the asset-holding class" that monetary policy is, historically, most careful not to inconvenience.
In interviews conducted across three states this week, ordinary Americans expressed varying degrees of relief.
"I feel like he gets it," said Dale Fromme, 54, a warehouse shift supervisor in Akron, Ohio, who has seen his grocery bill climb 34 percent since 2021. "Not my 'it,' obviously. But somebody's 'it.' The it of people who have a lot of money. And those people run things, so."
A new Meridian Research poll found that 61 percent of Americans "trust" or "somewhat trust" a Federal Reserve chairman who "has never personally experienced the psychological weight of a declined credit card," compared with just 38 percent who preferred a chairman who "shops at the same places they do." The remaining 1 percent responded "what is the Federal Reserve," which Meridian flagged as a separate and more urgent crisis.
"People want someone steady," said Fromme. "Like, steady in the way that only having, what, a hundred and fifty million dollars makes you steady."
The confirmation vote follows two days of hearings in which Warsh testified about his vision for price stability, interest rate policy, and what he called "the importance of credibility." He declined to specify whose credibility, or credible to whom, but senators described the remarks as "very credible."
Sen. Donna Farwell (D-MA), who has indicated she will vote in favor, issued a statement praising Warsh's "deep understanding of economic forces that affect households across America, particularly households in Greenwich, Aspen, and the better parts of Palm Beach."
Sen. Marcus Guillory (R-LA), chair of the Banking Committee, went further: "Jerome Powell did a fine job, but his net worth was, what, twenty million? Fifty? The point is, you can't truly understand price pressure until price pressure has become, for you, a purely academic exercise. Kevin is there. Kevin has been there for decades."
Warsh himself remained characteristically measured. Asked by reporters whether he understood the financial pressures facing working Americans, he paused, smiled, and said: "Absolutely. I've read extensively about them."
Warsh is expected to begin his term on May 16, following Powell's final day Friday. His priorities, according to transition advisors, include "restoring Fed credibility," "reassessing the pace of rate decisions," and "ensuring the institution's independence" — a term that, in context, senators described as meaning "independent from political pressure, but appropriately sensitive to the concerns of people with significant bond portfolios."
Markets responded positively to the confirmation news. The S&P 500 rose 0.4 percent. Egg prices did not move.
— IRREVERENT NEWZ — GENERAL DESK
Congress Finally Agrees On Something, Forms Committee to Study What It Was
WASHINGTON — In what congressional observers called a rare and possibly historic display of bipartisan cooperation, the United States Senate convened a special hearing Tuesday to formally consider whether the United States Senate should continue to exist. The motion passed unanimously.
The six-hour session, organized by the Committee on Rules and Administration, drew 34 of the Senate's 100 members, a turnout several senior senators described as "strong" given that many of their colleagues had scheduling conflicts, were in constituent meetings, or had not been made aware the hearing was occurring. Three additional senators arrived during the closing remarks, asked if they had missed anything, and were told no.
"What we're doing today is asking the hard questions," said Committee Chairman Gerald T. Prentiss, Republican of Nebraska, in his opening remarks. "The American people deserve a Senate that is accountable. And if that Senate is this one, so be it. If it is some other institution, we are prepared to explore that." He added that his office had already received inquiries from the Elks Club and a regional bowling league.
Ranking Member Sylvia Okonkwo-Harte, Democrat of Massachusetts, called the hearing "long overdue." She noted that she had first proposed a similar hearing in 2019, at which point the Senate had formed a working group to study the proposal, which had not yet reported back.
"For too long, this body has failed to examine whether this body is working," she said. "Today we begin that examination. I want to thank Chairman Prentiss for his leadership, and I look forward to a robust, evidence-based conversation that results in the formation of a working group to determine next steps."
Both senators received sustained applause from staff, none of whom were sure why.
The hearing came in response to a Gallup poll released last month showing Senate approval ratings at "hantavirus" levels, statistically zero. A follow-up poll found that 64 percent of Americans believed Congress was "not working," 22 percent believed it had "never worked," and 14 percent were unsure Congress still existed. The remaining 0 percent believed it was working well, which pollsters attributed to rounding.
That last figure was described by several senators as "alarming."
"People aren't sure we're here," said Sen. Douglas Feld, Democrat of Oregon. "I'm here. I can confirm that. I have a parking pass." He paused. "But the fact that Americans have to take that on faith tells you something about our communications problem."
Sen. Feld later clarified that he was not suggesting the Senate's problem was primarily communicative in nature.
"It might also be functional," he said. "Or structural. Or possibly it's pointless at this point. We're keeping an open mind."
The first panel of witnesses included two constitutional scholars, a former Senate parliamentarian, a behavioral economist, and a man named Gerald Hawes who had driven from Akron, Ohio, because he saw the hearing listed on C-SPAN's website and had not had anything to do that day. He was the only witness to receive a round of applause.
Dr. Anita Flores, a constitutional scholar from Georgetown University Law Center, told the committee that the Senate was, as of the date of her testimony, still legally required to exist.
"Article One of the Constitution establishes a bicameral legislature," she said. "Congress cannot dissolve itself without amending the Constitution, which would require, among other things, Congress to be functioning well enough to pass an amendment."
She paused.
"I recognize the circularity there," she added. "I did not say it would be easy. I said it would be unconstitutional."
Under questioning from Sen. Prentiss, Dr. Flores confirmed that the Senate had technically passed legislation in recent years, including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and a resolution naming a post office in Flagstaff, Arizona, after a local veteran. She noted that the post office resolution had passed 97-0.
"So there is output," Sen. Prentiss said.
"There is output," Dr. Flores agreed.
"Would you characterize that output as sufficient?"
Dr. Flores consulted her notes for a moment.
"I would characterize it as output," she said.
The hearing grew briefly contentious during the second panel, when Sen. Marjorie Fulton, Republican of Tennessee, asked witness Dr. Paul Chen, a behavioral economist at the Brookings Institution, whether the Senate's approval rating could be improved through "better branding."
Dr. Chen said that while messaging strategies could influence short-term perception, research consistently showed that public trust in institutions was correlated with institutional performance.
"So you're saying we need to perform better," Sen. Fulton said.
"That would be one interpretation of the data, yes."
"That seems like a very Washington answer."
Dr. Chen noted that he had, in fact, come from Washington for the hearing, having been asked to testify by the Senate.
Sen. Fulton said she understood that but felt the answer was still inside-the-Beltway thinking.
Dr. Chen asked if she would like him to recommend something outside-the-Beltway.
"If you could," she said.
He recommended the Senate pass more legislation.
Sen. Fulton said that was easier said than done.
Dr. Chen agreed that it was. He then noted that he was not being paid for this.
Gerald Hawes, the man from Akron, was initially told he would not be permitted to testify, as he had not submitted written testimony in advance and was not a recognized expert in the relevant fields. However, after a 20-minute recess during which two witnesses lost audio connectivity and a third discovered a scheduling conflict, the committee invited him to the table.
Mr. Hawes said he had been watching C-SPAN for 30 years and had some thoughts.
"You people don't seem to like each other very much," he said, "and when you do like each other, you seem embarrassed about it. I don't know how you run a country like that. My bowling league has better chemistry, and we had a theft."
There was a silence.
"That's a fair observation," said Sen. Okonkwo-Harte.
"Thank you," said Mr. Hawes.
He was then informed his time had expired.
"I wasn't done," he said.
"None of us are," said Sen. Okonkwo-Harte.
The hearing concluded without a formal recommendation, which Sen. Prentiss said was "appropriate given where we are in the process."
The committee voted 8-3 to form a working group to study the question of the Senate's continued existence. The working group will include six senators, two outside consultants, and a bipartisan staff team, and is expected to deliver a preliminary report by the end of fiscal year 2027. The three dissenting senators said they preferred to form a subcommittee.
Sen. Okonkwo-Harte said she was "encouraged by the progress."
"We began today with a question," she said. "We leave today with a working group. That's not nothing. But it's also not much."
When a reporter asked whether the working group had the authority to actually recommend abolishing the Senate, a spokesperson for the committee said the matter was "outside the scope of the working group's mandate."
When the reporter asked what the working group's mandate was, the spokesperson said the working group would determine that at its first meeting, which had not yet been scheduled.
The reporter then asked when the first meeting would be scheduled.
The spokesperson said that would be the second meeting.
The Senate then recessed until Wednesday, when it will take up a bill to rename a post office. The post office in question was the same one named in the previous session's resolution, which had been misspelled.
— IRREVERENT NEWZ — GENERAL DESK
IRREVERENT Magazine is a work of satire and parody. All quotes, scenarios, and attributed statements in this article are fictional and intended for humorous purposes. Senators Gerald T. Prentiss, Sylvia Okonkwo-Harte, Douglas Feld, and Marjorie Fulton are fictional characters. Gerald Hawes is also fictional, though we feel he should exist.